↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of antibacterial and osteogenic properties of a novel Poly (acrylic acid)-calcium-zinc biomineralized hydrogel

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Materials, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of antibacterial and osteogenic properties of a novel Poly (acrylic acid)-calcium-zinc biomineralized hydrogel
Published in
Frontiers in Materials, August 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmats.2024.1444750
Authors

Xiaobin Xie, Xiaoxiao Feng, Lihui Hong, Xinke Yu, Hongye Li, Hao Zhang, Mingming Liu, Yimeng Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2024.
All research outputs
#21,543,207
of 26,445,299 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Materials
#713
of 3,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,277
of 138,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Materials
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,445,299 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.