↓ Skip to main content

Views of General Practitioners on Indoor Environmental Health Risks in the Perinatal Period

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Views of General Practitioners on Indoor Environmental Health Risks in the Perinatal Period
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2015.00032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gladys Ibanez, Jehan Zabar, Jean-Sébastien Cadwallader, Claire Rondet, Matthias Lochard, Anne Marie Magnier

Abstract

Home is generally perceived as a safety place, whereas the concentration of pollutants, influenced not only by external pollution but also by human activities, the presence of domestic animals, construction and furniture materials, are sometimes greater than outside. The aim of this study is to determine the general practitioners' (GPs) views on indoor environmental health risks in the perinatal period. Four semi-structured focus group with 31 GPs were conducted in two French departments in November 2009, February, March, and April 2010. The focus group meetings were analyzed using a general thematic analysis. Perinatal care is a special health issue and a time of privileged sensitization. The attitude of health risks are well known in the case of "traditionally" toxic substances. In the case of "emerging" environmental exposure, these attitudes depend on the knowledge, beliefs, and experience specific to each practitioner. GPs are acquiring a new role in the field of environmental health, while at the same time coming to grips with its own strengths and limitations. The implementation of prevention depends on factors, which are not only specific to the practitioner but also related to the parents and the organization of the medical practice. The sensitization of GPs to environmental medicine, promotion of eco-citizen education, development of research, and the distribution of information are some of the means which need to be implemented to prevent harmful exposure of the infant.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Other 6 26%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 6 26%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,331,767
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,959
of 5,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,191
of 265,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.