↓ Skip to main content

Complement in Kidney Transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complement in Kidney Transplantation
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2017.00066
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marek Cernoch, Ondrej Viklicky

Abstract

The complement system is considered to be an important part of innate immune system with a significant role in inflammation processes. The activation can occur through classical, alternative, or lectin pathway, resulting in the creation of anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a, possessing a vast spectrum of immune functions, and the assembly of terminal complement cascade, capable of direct cell lysis. The activation processes are tightly regulated; inappropriate activation of the complement cascade plays a significant role in many renal diseases including organ transplantation. Moreover, complement cascade is activated during ischemia/reperfusion injury processes and influences delayed graft function of kidney allografts. Interestingly, complement system has been found to play a role in both acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejections and thrombotic microangiopathy. Therefore, complement system may represent an interesting therapeutical target in kidney transplant pathologies.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 25%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2017.
All research outputs
#18,552,700
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,971
of 5,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,115
of 316,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#47
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.