↓ Skip to main content

Commentary: Renal Function Estimation and Cockcroft–Gault Formulas for Predicting Cardiovascular Mortality in Population-Based, Cardiovascular Risk, Heart Failure and Post-Myocardial Infarction…

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Commentary: Renal Function Estimation and Cockcroft–Gault Formulas for Predicting Cardiovascular Mortality in Population-Based, Cardiovascular Risk, Heart Failure and Post-Myocardial Infarction Cohorts: The Heart ‘OMics’ in AGEing (HOMAGE) and the High-Risk Myocardial Infarction Database Initiatives
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, June 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2017.00077
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas J. Wilkinson, Douglas W. Gould, Emma L. Watson, Alice C. Smith

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Decision Sciences 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2017.
All research outputs
#15,390,547
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,827
of 7,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,348
of 332,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#37
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.