↓ Skip to main content

Placental Malaria: A New Insight into the Pathophysiology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Placental Malaria: A New Insight into the Pathophysiology
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, July 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2017.00117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lalita Sharma, Geeta Shukla

Abstract

Malaria in pregnancy poses a great health risk to mother and her fetus and results into complications, such as abortion, still birth, intra uterine growth retardation, and low birth weight. The heavy infiltration of Plasmodium falciparum-infected RBCs in the intervillous spaces of placenta seems to be responsible for all the complications observed. Infected RBCs in the placenta cause an inflammatory environment with increase in inflammatory cells and cytokines which is deleterious to the placenta. Increased inflammatory responses in the infected placenta result into oxidative stress that in turn causes oxidative stress-induced placental cell death. Moreover, heat shock proteins that are produced in high concentration in stressed cells to combat the stress have been reported in fewer concentrations in malaria-infected placenta. Pathologies associated with placental malaria seems to be the effect of a change in immune status from antibody-mediated immune response to cell-mediated immune response resulting into excess inflammation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and decreased heat shock protein expression. However, we also need to study other aspects of pathologies so that better drugs can be designed with new molecular targets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 299 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 13%
Student > Bachelor 34 11%
Researcher 21 7%
Student > Postgraduate 16 5%
Other 48 16%
Unknown 103 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 32 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 5%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 109 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2022.
All research outputs
#13,901,936
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,296
of 6,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,829
of 317,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#42
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.