↓ Skip to main content

Regulating NETosis: Increasing pH Promotes NADPH Oxidase-Dependent NETosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regulating NETosis: Increasing pH Promotes NADPH Oxidase-Dependent NETosis
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2018.00019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meraj A. Khan, Lijy M. Philip, Guillaume Cheung, Shawn Vadakepeedika, Hartmut Grasemann, Neil Sweezey, Nades Palaniyar

Abstract

Neutrophils migrating from the blood (pH 7.35-7.45) into the surrounding tissues encounter changes in extracellular pH (pHe) conditions. Upon activation of NADPH oxidase 2 (Nox), neutrophils generate large amounts of H+ions reducing the intracellular pH (pHi). Nevertheless, how extracellular pH regulates neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation (NETosis) is not clearly established. We hypothesized that increasing pH increases Nox-mediated production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and neutrophil protease activity, stimulating NETosis. Here, we found that raising pHe(ranging from 6.6 to 7.8; every 0.2 units) increased pHiof both activated and resting neutrophils within 10-20 min (Seminaphtharhodafluor dual fluorescence measurements). Since Nox activity generates H+ions, pHiis lower in neutrophils that are activated compared to resting. We also found that higher pH stimulated Nox-dependent ROS production (R123 generation; flow cytometry, plate reader assay, and imaging) during spontaneous and phorbol myristate acetate-induced NETosis (Sytox Green assays, immunoconfocal microscopy, and quantifying NETs). In neutrophils that are activated and not resting, higher pH stimulated histone H4 cleavage (Western blots) and NETosis. Raising pH increasedEscherichia colilipopolysaccharide-,Pseudomonas aeruginosa(Gram-negative)-, andStaphylococcus aureus(Gram-positive)-induced NETosis. Thus, higher pHepromoted Nox-dependent ROS production, protease activity, and NETosis; lower pH has the opposite effect. These studies provided mechanistic steps of pHe-mediated regulation of Nox-dependent NETosis. Raising pH either by sodium bicarbonate or Tris base (clinically known as Tris hydroxymethyl aminomethane, tromethamine, or THAM) increases NETosis. Each Tris molecule can bind 3H+ions, whereas each bicarbonate HCO3-ion binds 1H+ion. Therefore, the amount of Tris solution required to cause the same increase in pH level is less than that of equimolar bicarbonate solution. For that reason, regulating NETosis by pH with specific buffers such as THAM could be more effective than bicarbonate in managing NET-related diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 24%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 30 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Chemical Engineering 3 3%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 34 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,881,298
of 26,381,140 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,202
of 7,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,694
of 461,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#22
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,381,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.