↓ Skip to main content

Precision Medicine and Global Health: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Precision Medicine and Global Health: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2018.00067
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexios-Fotios A. Mentis, Kleoniki Pantelidi, Efthimios Dardiotis, Georgios M. Hadjigeorgiou, Efthimia Petinaki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Unspecified 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 6 26%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Other 7 30%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,623,049
of 23,372,952 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,810
of 5,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,035
of 334,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#49
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,372,952 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.