↓ Skip to main content

Definition of NPSLE: Does the ACR Nomenclature Still Hold?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Definition of NPSLE: Does the ACR Nomenclature Still Hold?
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2018.00138
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Fernandes Vivaldo, Jaqueline Cristina de Amorim, Paulo Rogério Julio, Rodrigo Joel de Oliveira, Simone Appenzeller

Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients have frequently neuropsychiatric manifestations. From the first description of coma in 1875, a variety of manifestations has been described to occur in SLE. However, the lack of standardization reduced the comparability of published studies. In 1999, the American College of Rheumatology published guidelines to define neuropsychiatric nomenclature in SLE. This was the first step toward uniform diagnostic criteria. Several studies have been published since then applying the ACR criteria and frequencies of different manifestations can now be compared between cohorts. Although these criteria are diagnostic, therapeutic approach to different manifestations varies according to nature and severity of the manifestations. Herby, we will review the different definition for NPSLE published, and determine advantages and limitation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Postgraduate 11 10%
Other 9 9%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 33 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 47%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 37 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2018.
All research outputs
#18,732,892
of 23,220,133 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#4,124
of 5,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,173
of 331,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#86
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,220,133 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.