↓ Skip to main content

Pulmonary Arterial Stiffness: An Early and Pervasive Driver of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pulmonary Arterial Stiffness: An Early and Pervasive Driver of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2018.00204
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Sun, Stephen Y. Chan

Abstract

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a historically neglected and highly morbid vascular disease that leads to right heart failure and, in some cases, death. The molecular origins of this disease have been poorly defined, and as such, current pulmonary vasodilator therapies do not cure or reverse this disease. Although extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling and pulmonary arterial stiffening have long been associated with end-stage PAH, recent studies have reported that such vascular stiffening can occur early in pathogenesis. Furthermore, there is emerging evidence that ECM stiffening may represent a key first step in pathogenic reprogramming and molecular crosstalk among endothelial, smooth muscle, and fibroblast cells in the remodeled pulmonary vessel. Such processes represent the convergence of activation of a number of specific mechanoactivated signaling pathways, microRNAs, and metabolic pathways in pulmonary vasculature. In this review, we summarize the contemporary understanding of vascular stiffening as a driver of PAH, its mechanisms, potential therapeutic targets and clinical perspectives. Of note, early intervention targeting arterial stiffness may break the vicious cycle of PAH progression, leading to outcome improvement which has not been demonstrated by current vasodilator therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 15%
Engineering 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Unspecified 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 16 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,643,992
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#4,066
of 5,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,404
of 329,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#54
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.