↓ Skip to main content

Disease-Specific Enteric Microbiome Dysbiosis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Disease-Specific Enteric Microbiome Dysbiosis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, November 2018
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2018.00304
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hengameh Chloé Mirsepasi-Lauridsen, Katleen Vrankx, Jørgen Engberg, Alice Friis-Møller, Jørn Brynskov, Inge Nordgaard-Lassen, Andreas Munk Petersen, Karen Angeliki Krogfelt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Other 6 7%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 26 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 31 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2018.
All research outputs
#14,430,049
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,518
of 5,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,363
of 437,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#39
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.