You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chimeric Antigen Receptor Signaling Domains Differentially Regulate Proliferation and Native T Cell Receptor Function in Virus-Specific T Cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2018.00343 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bilal Omer, Paul A. Castillo, Haruko Tashiro, Thomas Shum, Mai T. A. Huynh, Mara Cardenas, Miyuki Tanaka, Andrew Lewis, Tim Sauer, Robin Parihar, Natalia Lapteva, Michael Schmueck-Henneresse, Malini Mukherjee, Stephen Gottschalk, Cliona M. Rooney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 18 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,264,739
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,739
of 7,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,750
of 449,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#28
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.