The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cell Line Derived Xenograft Mouse Models Are a Suitable in vivo Model for Studying Tumor Budding in Colorectal Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2019.00139 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laurent M. C. Georges, Olivier De Wever, José A. Galván, Heather Dawson, Alessandro Lugli, Pieter Demetter, Inti Zlobec |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 14% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 14% |
| Chile | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,389,883
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,452
of 5,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,212
of 350,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#20
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.