The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Critical Review of European Health-Economic Guidelines for the Health Technology Assessment of Medical Devices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2019.00278 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maximilian Blüher, Sita J. Saunders, Virginie Mittard, Rafael Torrejon Torres, Jason A. Davis, Rhodri Saunders |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 43 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2019.
All research outputs
#14,465,357
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,540
of 5,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,617
of 459,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#40
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.