↓ Skip to main content

Perception and Performance on a Virtual Reality Cognitive Stimulation for Use in the Intensive Care Unit: A Non-randomized Trial in Critically Ill Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perception and Performance on a Virtual Reality Cognitive Stimulation for Use in the Intensive Care Unit: A Non-randomized Trial in Critically Ill Patients
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, December 2019
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2019.00287
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephan M. Gerber, Marie-Madlen Jeitziner, Samuel E. J. Knobel, Urs P. Mosimann, René M. Müri, Stephan M. Jakob, Tobias Nef

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 129 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 18%
Student > Master 12 9%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 56 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Computer Science 9 7%
Psychology 9 7%
Engineering 7 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 58 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2019.
All research outputs
#18,704,331
of 23,182,015 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#4,097
of 5,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#336,905
of 459,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#64
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,182,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.