The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 191 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Challenges in the Management of SARS-CoV2 Infection: The Role of Oral Bacteriotherapy as Complementary Therapeutic Strategy to Avoid the Progression of COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2020.00389 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabriella d'Ettorre, Giancarlo Ceccarelli, Massimiliano Marazzato, Giuseppe Campagna, Claudia Pinacchio, Francesco Alessandri, Franco Ruberto, Giacomo Rossi, Luigi Celani, Carolina Scagnolari, Cristina Mastropietro, Vito Trinchieri, Gregorio Egidio Recchia, Vera Mauro, Guido Antonelli, Francesco Pugliese, Claudio Maria Mastroianni |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 6% |
| France | 7 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
| Canada | 5 | 3% |
| Mexico | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 144 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 152 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 10% |
| Scientists | 18 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 259 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 12% |
| Researcher | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 10% |
| Other | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 19% |
| Unknown | 87 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 15% |
| Unknown | 95 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 257. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2024.
All research outputs
#152,588
of 26,574,355 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#63
of 7,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,925
of 434,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#2
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,574,355 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,681 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.