The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Evaluation of Four Commercial Kits for SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Approved by Emergency-Use-Authorization in Korea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2020.00521 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kyu-Hwa Hur, Kuenyoul Park, Youngkuen Lim, Yun Sil Jeong, Heungsup Sung, Mi-Na Kim |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 15% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 42 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 43 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2021.
All research outputs
#15,623,687
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,150
of 5,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,534
of 398,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#131
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.