The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Incidence and Persistence of Viral Shedding in COVID-19 Post-acute Patients With Negativized Pharyngeal Swab: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2020.00562 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giovanni Morone, Angela Palomba, Marco Iosa, Teodorico Caporaso, Domenico De Angelis, Vincenzo Venturiero, Anna Savo, Paola Coiro, Dario Carbone, Francesca Gimigliano, Giovanni Iolascon, Stefano Paolucci |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 47 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 51 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,448,997
of 23,138,859 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#600
of 5,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,554
of 398,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#34
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,138,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.