The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Visual and Biochemical Evidence of Glycocalyx Disruption in Human Dengue Infection, and Association With Plasma Leakage Severity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2020.545813 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Phung Khanh Lam, Angela McBride, Duyen Huynh Thi Le, Trieu Trung Huynh, Hans Vink, Bridget Wills, Sophie Yacoub |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Vietnam | 4 | 18% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 16 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 64% |
Scientists | 6 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
Researcher | 4 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 15% |
Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 15% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,251,675
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#543
of 5,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,598
of 415,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#26
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.