The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Risk-Based Approach to the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Experience in National Dental Centre Singapore
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2020.562728 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Rong Hao Tay, Ethan Ng, Marianne Meng Ann Ong, Chelsia Sim, Ken Tan, Chaminda Jayampath Seneviratne |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Myanmar | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 53 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 51 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2020.
All research outputs
#14,769,487
of 24,758,493 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,598
of 6,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,132
of 519,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#118
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,758,493 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.