You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of Graded Passive Cycling on Hemodynamics, Cerebral Blood Flow, and Cardiac Function in Septic ICU Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2020.569679 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer Chen, Claudio Martin, Ian M. Ball, Christopher W. McIntyre, Marat Slessarev |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 10% |
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| Canada | 3 | 10% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 72% |
| Scientists | 5 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 15% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 24% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 24% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 12% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,256,673
of 25,208,845 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#651
of 7,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,444
of 424,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#26
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,208,845 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.