The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Integrated Care for Older People Screening Tool for Measuring Intrinsic Capacity: Preliminary Findings From ICOPE Pilot in China
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2020.576079 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lina Ma, Jagadish K. Chhetri, Yaxin Zhang, Pan Liu, Yumeng Chen, Yun Li, Piu Chan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 17% |
Chile | 1 | 8% |
Mexico | 1 | 8% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
Researcher | 12 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
Professor | 6 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 10% |
Unknown | 64 | 52% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
Other | 12 | 10% |
Unknown | 75 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,976,848
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#479
of 5,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,358
of 506,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#26
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.