The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Management of Asymptomatic Sporadic Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (ASPEN) ≤2 cm: Study Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2020.598438 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefano Partelli, John K. Ramage, Sara Massironi, Alessandro Zerbi, Hong Beom Kim, Patricia Niccoli, Francesco Panzuto, Luca Landoni, Ales Tomazic, Toni Ibrahim, Gregory Kaltsas, Emilio Bertani, Alain Sauvanet, Eva Segelov, Martyn Caplin, Jorgelina Coppa, Thomas Armstrong, Martin O. Weickert, Giovanni Butturini, Stefan Staettner, Florian Boesch, Mauro Cives, Carol Anne Moulton, Jin He, Andreas Selberherr, Orit Twito, Antonio Castaldi, Claudio Giovanni De Angelis, Sebastien Gaujoux, Hussein Almeamar, Andrea Frilling, Emanuel Vigia, Colin Wilson, Francesca Muffatti, Raj Srirajaskanthan, Pietro Invernizzi, Andrea Lania, Wooil Kwon, Jacques Ewald, Maria Rinzivillo, Chiara Nessi, Lojze M. Smid, Andrea Gardini, Marina Tsoli, Edgardo E. Picardi, Olivia Hentic, Daniel Croagh, Christos Toumpanakis, Davide Citterio, Emma Ramsey, Barbara Mosterman, Paolo Regi, Silvia Gasteiger, Roberta E. Rossi, Valeria Smiroldo, Jin-Young Jang, Massimo Falconi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 23% |
| Unknown | 13 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2023.
All research outputs
#16,927,921
of 24,892,887 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,663
of 6,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#317,821
of 517,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#167
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,892,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.