The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Texture Analysis in the Diagnosis of Primary Breast Cancer: Comparison of High-Resolution Dedicated Breast Positron Emission Tomography (dbPET) and Whole-Body PET/CT
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, December 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2020.603303 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yoko Satoh, Kenji Hirata, Daiki Tamada, Satoshi Funayama, Hiroshi Onishi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 33% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 28% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Psychology | 1 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2020.
All research outputs
#18,779,356
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#4,137
of 5,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#376,354
of 504,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#206
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.