The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development and Use of Gene Therapy Orphan Drugs—Ethical Needs for a Broader Cooperation Between the Pharmaceutical Industry and Society
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2020.608249 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandor Kerpel-Fronius, Varvara Baroutsou, Sander Becker, Roberto Carlesi, Luis Collia, Brigitte Franke-Bray, Peter Kleist, Chieko Kurihara, Luis Filipe Laranjeira, Kotone Matsuyama, Shehla Naseem, Johanna Schenk, Honorio Silva |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 36 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Philosophy | 3 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 36 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2021.
All research outputs
#15,001,165
of 23,270,775 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,841
of 5,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,185
of 504,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#153
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,270,775 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.