↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Clinical Features in HLA-B27 Positive and Negative Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results From a Cohort of 4,131 Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Clinical Features in HLA-B27 Positive and Negative Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results From a Cohort of 4,131 Patients
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, December 2020
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2020.609562
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shangzhu Zhang, Yanhong Wang, Linyi Peng, Jinmei Su, Xiaofeng Zeng, Mengtao Li, Zhenbiao Wu, Jian Xu, Min Yang, Lijun Wu, Cheng Zhao, Xinwang Duan, Qin Li, Jing Zhu, Wenqiang Fan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 17 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 19 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2021.
All research outputs
#18,779,356
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#4,137
of 5,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#376,400
of 504,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#206
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.