The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development of Combination Methods for Detecting Malignant Uptakes Based on Physiological Uptake Detection Using Object Detection With PET-CT MIP Images
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, December 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2020.616746 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Masashi Kawakami, Kenji Hirata, Sho Furuya, Kentaro Kobayashi, Hiroyuki Sugimori, Keiichi Magota, Chietsugu Katoh |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 4 | 16% |
Engineering | 3 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 12% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 14 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2020.
All research outputs
#18,778,496
of 23,270,775 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#4,135
of 5,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#376,354
of 504,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#206
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,270,775 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.