The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Prospective Controlled Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of in vitro Expanded Recipient Regulatory T Cell Therapy and Tocilizumab Together With Donor Bone Marrow Infusion in HLA-Mismatched Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients (Trex001)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2020.634260 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rainer Oberbauer, Matthias Edinger, Gabriela Berlakovich, Peter Kalhs, Nina Worel, Georg Heinze, Michael Wolzt, Thomas Lion, Thomas Wekerle |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#18,974,825
of 23,523,017 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#4,225
of 6,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#379,972
of 507,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#219
of 287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,523,017 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.