You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Automated Digital Quantification of Pulmonary Fibrosis in Human Histopathology Specimens
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.607720 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauren C. Testa, Yvon Jule, Linnea Lundh, Karine Bertotti, Melissa A. Merideth, Kevin J. O'Brien, Steven D. Nathan, Drew C. Venuto, Souheil El-Chemaly, May Christine V. Malicdan, Bernadette R. Gochuico |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 24% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2021.
All research outputs
#15,866,607
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,244
of 6,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,669
of 447,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#215
of 412 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 412 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.