You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prospective Comparison of Saliva and Nasopharyngeal Swab Sampling for Mass Screening for COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.621160 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mathieu Nacher, Mayka Mergeay-Fabre, Denis Blanchet, Orelie Benoit, Tristan Pozl, Pauline Mesphoule, Vincent Sainte-Rose, Véronique Vialette, Bruno Toulet, Aurélie Moua, Mona Saout, Stéphane Simon, Manon Guidarelli, Muriel Galindo, Barbara Biche, William Faurous, Laurie Chaizemartin, Aniza Fahrasmane, Devi Rochemont, Nicolas Vignier, Astrid Vabret, Magalie Demar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 22% |
| Unknown | 14 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2021.
All research outputs
#20,710,927
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#5,181
of 5,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#361,026
of 418,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#303
of 334 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 334 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.