You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Review of SARS-CoV2: Compared With SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.628370 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Huan Zhou, Junfa Yang, Chang Zhou, Bangjie Chen, Hui Fang, Shuo Chen, Xianzheng Zhang, Linding Wang, Lingling Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 57 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 54 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,873,965
of 26,202,139 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,385
of 7,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,228
of 528,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#190
of 612 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,202,139 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 612 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.