↓ Skip to main content

Possible Sarcopenia and Impact of Dual-Task Exercise on Gait Speed, Handgrip Strength, Falls, and Perceived Health

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Possible Sarcopenia and Impact of Dual-Task Exercise on Gait Speed, Handgrip Strength, Falls, and Perceived Health
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, April 2021
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2021.660463
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reshma Aziz Merchant, Yiong Huak Chan, Richard Jor Yeong Hui, Jia Yi Lim, Sing Cheer Kwek, Santhosh K. Seetharaman, Lydia Shu Yi Au, John E. Morley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 179 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Master 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Researcher 9 5%
Other 6 3%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 95 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 10%
Sports and Recreations 11 6%
Psychology 6 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 104 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,416,520
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#593
of 5,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,186
of 402,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#43
of 364 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 364 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.