↓ Skip to main content

CERN-MEDICIS: A Review Since Commissioning in 2017

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CERN-MEDICIS: A Review Since Commissioning in 2017
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, July 2021
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2021.693682
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlotte Duchemin, Joao P. Ramos, Thierry Stora, Essraa Ahmed, Elodie Aubert, Nadia Audouin, Ermanno Barbero, Vincent Barozier, Ana-Paula Bernardes, Philippe Bertreix, Aurore Boscher, Frank Bruchertseifer, Richard Catherall, Eric Chevallay, Pinelopi Christodoulou, Katerina Chrysalidis, Thomas E. Cocolios, Jeremie Comte, Bernard Crepieux, Matthieu Deschamps, Kristof Dockx, Alexandre Dorsival, Valentin N. Fedosseev, Pascal Fernier, Robert Formento-Cavaier, Safouane El Idrissi, Peter Ivanov, Vadim M. Gadelshin, Simone Gilardoni, Jean-Louis Grenard, Ferid Haddad, Reinhard Heinke, Benjamin Juif, Umair Khalid, Moazam Khan, Ulli Köster, Laura Lambert, G. Lilli, Giacomo Lunghi, Bruce A. Marsh, Yisel Martinez Palenzuela, Renata Martins, Stefano Marzari, Nabil Menaa, Nathalie Michel, Maxime Munos, Fabio Pozzi, Francesco Riccardi, Julien Riegert, Nicolas Riggaz, Jean-Yves Rinchet, Sebastian Rothe, Ben Russell, Christelle Saury, Thomas Schneider, Simon Stegemann, Zeynep Talip, Christian Theis, Julien Thiboud, Nicholas P. van der Meulen, Miranda van Stenis, Heinz Vincke, Joachim Vollaire, Nhat-Tan Vuong, Benjamin Webster, Klaus Wendt, Shane G. Wilkins, the CERN-MEDICIS collaboration

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 29%
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Student > Postgraduate 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 7 29%
Chemistry 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Unknown 13 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,438,907
of 24,004,724 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,811
of 6,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,053
of 424,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#126
of 423 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,004,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 423 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.