The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.694385 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xianhua Meng, Kai Chen, Chenchen Yang, Hui Li, Xiaohong Wang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 50% |
Brazil | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 153 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 4% |
Researcher | 6 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 3% |
Lecturer | 5 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 10% |
Unknown | 100 | 65% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 2% |
Unknown | 100 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,816,835
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#942
of 5,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,105
of 432,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#73
of 410 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 410 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.