The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chinese Medicine Formula Huashibaidu Granule Early Treatment for Mild COVID-19 Patients: An Unblinded, Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.696976 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chen Zhao, Li Li, Wei Yang, Wenliang Lv, Jian Wang, Jing Guo, Yu Dong, Nannan Shi, Cheng Lu, Zhiqiang Li, Zhan Shi, Renbo Chen, Ruili Huo, Qianzi Che, Yaxin Tian, Xinghua Xiang, Jian Wang, Junhui Zhou, Yongjun Bian, Suping Chen, Yang Chen, Yingying Chen, Xiaodong Cong, Guoju Dong, Lijie Hu, Jianxin Jiang, Luxing Leng, Bin Li, Dongxu Li, Hao Li, Jing Li, Wensheng Qi, Qing Miao, Huaxin Shi, Jiaheng Shi, Bing Wang, Gang Wang, Wei Wang, Yongyue Xian, Xiaolei Xie, Chunyan Xu, Ming Xu, Bei Yan, Jinliang Yang, Li Zhang, Zhenqi Zhou, Haoning Zhu, Yibai Xiong, Bin Liu, Luqi Huang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Engineering | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2022.
All research outputs
#18,069,311
of 26,438,498 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#4,041
of 7,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,852
of 426,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#265
of 477 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,438,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 477 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.