The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
From Single Batch to Mass Production–Automated Platform Design Concept for a Phase II Clinical Trial Tissue Engineered Cartilage Product
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.712917 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sebastian Haeusner, Laura Herbst, Patrick Bittorf, Thomas Schwarz, Chris Henze, Marc Mauermann, Jelena Ochs, Robert Schmitt, Ulrich Blache, Anke Wixmerten, Sylvie Miot, Ivan Martin, Oliver Pullig |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 15% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 15% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 5% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2021.
All research outputs
#15,025,659
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,857
of 5,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,795
of 431,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#210
of 420 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 420 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.