You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pneumonia Patients Caused by Co-infection With SARS-CoV-2 and Human Adenovirus in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.735779 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shaofu Qiu, Ge Zeng, Peihan Li, Xiaohui Li, Hongbo Liu, Xinying Du, Hongbo Liu, Heng Zhang, Xingyu Xiang, Hui Wang, Xiangbing Chen, Guangyao Yang, Sai Tian, Ligui Wang, Mingjuan Yang, Chaojie Yang, Lidong Gao, Shixiong Hu, Hongbin Song, Zhifei Zhan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 28% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
| Scientists | 6 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 73% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 80% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,136,352
of 25,845,749 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#895
of 7,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,807
of 438,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#59
of 484 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 484 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.