↓ Skip to main content

Methods of Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation in Adult: A Network Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methods of Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation in Adult: A Network Meta-Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, October 2021
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2021.752984
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong-Jie Jhou, Po-Huang Chen, Liang-Jun Ou-Yang, Chin Lin, Shih-En Tang, Cho-Hao Lee

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Student > Master 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 38 73%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Decision Sciences 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 38 73%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,170,058
of 26,452,360 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#933
of 7,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,392
of 442,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#59
of 495 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,452,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 495 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.