The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Improving Access to Refractive Services in Adults: A Health Examination Center-Based Model
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.753257 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Haishuang Lin, Jing Sun, Nathan Congdon, Meiping Xu, Shanshan Liu, Yuanbo Liang, Hailin Wang, Shaodan Zhang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 29% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,930,571
of 23,506,079 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#985
of 6,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,478
of 440,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#75
of 534 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,506,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 534 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.