The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exercise for Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Expert Consensus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.756940 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yong-Hui Zhang, Hao-Yu Hu, Yuan-Chang Xiong, Changgeng Peng, Li Hu, Ya-Zhuo Kong, Yu-Ling Wang, Jia-Bao Guo, Sheng Bi, Tie-Shan Li, Li-Juan Ao, Chu-Huai Wang, Yu-Long Bai, Lei Fang, Chao Ma, Lin-Rong Liao, Hao Liu, Yi Zhu, Zhi-Jie Zhang, Chun-Long Liu, Guo-En Fang, Xue-Qiang Wang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 24 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 91% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 360 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 52 | 14% |
| Unknown | 210 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 19 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 27 | 8% |
| Unknown | 219 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#772,327
of 26,134,677 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#231
of 7,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,851
of 527,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#22
of 565 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,134,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 527,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 565 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.