↓ Skip to main content

Case Report: Self-Resolved Macular Edema Secondary to Congenital Retinal Macrovessels

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Case Report: Self-Resolved Macular Edema Secondary to Congenital Retinal Macrovessels
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, January 2022
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2021.771007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fang Zheng, Kairan Lai, Houfa Yin, Jingliang He, Yufeng Xu, Panpan Ye

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2022.
All research outputs
#15,523,867
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,084
of 5,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,246
of 501,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#314
of 611 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 501,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 611 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.