The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Effect of Dexmedetomidine as a Sedative Agent for Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.776882 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caimu Wang, Qijiang Chen, Ping Wang, Weisheng Jin, Chao Zhong, Zisheng Ge, Kangmin Xu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Researcher | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 36% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2022.
All research outputs
#5,823,299
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,283
of 5,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,848
of 503,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#108
of 589 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 589 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.