You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.779019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linbo Peng, Kexin Wang, Yi Zeng, Yuangang Wu, Haibo Si, Bin Shen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 20% |
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 23% |
| Unknown | 18 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2022.
All research outputs
#6,850,193
of 23,138,859 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,557
of 5,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,943
of 505,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#134
of 581 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,138,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 581 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.