↓ Skip to main content

Plasma Exchange-Based Non-bioartificial Liver Support System Improves the Short-Term Outcomes of Patients With Hepatitis B Virus-Associated Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure: A Multicenter Prospective…

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plasma Exchange-Based Non-bioartificial Liver Support System Improves the Short-Term Outcomes of Patients With Hepatitis B Virus-Associated Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, November 2021
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2021.779744
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuan-yuan Chen, Hai Li, Bao-yan Xu, Xin Zheng, Bei-ling Li, Xian-bo Wang, Yan Huang, Yan-hang Gao, Zhi-ping Qian, Feng Liu, Xiao-bo Lu, Jia Shang, Hai Li, Shao-yang Wang, Yin-hua Zhang, Zhong-ji Meng, Chinese Chronic Liver Failure Consortium, Shan Yin, Wenyi Gu, Yan Zhang, Tongyu Wang, Dandan Wu, Fuchen Dong, Bo Zeng, Liuying Chen, Shijin Wang, Qun Zhang, Yixin Hou, Yuxin Li, Yunyi Huang, Shuning Sun, Wenting Tan, Xiaomei Xiang, Yunjie Dan, Guohong Deng, Jun Chen, Chengjin Liao, Xiaoxiao Liu, Jing Liu, Ling Xu, Shue Xiong, Yan Xiong, Congcong Zou, Jinjun Chen, Congyan Zhu, Chang Jiang, Xiaoyu Wen, Na Gao, Chunyan Liu, Qing Lei, Sen Luo, Haotang Ren, Xue Mei, Jiefei Wang, Liujuan Ji, Tao Li, Xuanqiong Fang, Jing Li, Ziyu Wan, Rongjiong Zheng, Fangrong Jie, Nan Li, Huiming Jin, Hai Li, Qing Zhang, Xuequn Zheng, Shaoyang Wang, Taofa Lin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 63%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,662,542
of 26,222,113 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#2,026
of 7,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,332
of 419,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#140
of 559 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,222,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 559 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.