↓ Skip to main content

ERANET JTC 2011: Submission and Activation of an International Academic Translational Project in Advanced Breast Cancer. Experience From the ET-FES Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ERANET JTC 2011: Submission and Activation of an International Academic Translational Project in Advanced Breast Cancer. Experience From the ET-FES Study
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, January 2022
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2021.817678
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuela Monti, Tom Degenhardt, Etienne Brain, Rachel Wuerstlein, Alessandra Argusti, Matteo Puntoni, Gian Andrea Rollandi, Davide Corradengo, Luca Boni, Harun Ilhan, Oriana Nanni, Javier Cortes, Alejandro Piris-Gimenez, Arnoldo Piccardo, Massimiliano Iacozzi, Federica Matteucci, Valentina Di Iorio, Jean Louis Alberini, Carolien Schröder, Nadia Harbeck, Alessandra Gennari

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 15%
Other 2 15%
Lecturer 1 8%
Unknown 8 62%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Unknown 8 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#20,474,050
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#5,026
of 5,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#415,457
of 506,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#499
of 615 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 615 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.