You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of trained scent dogs for detection of COVID-19 and evidence of cost-saving
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.1006315 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leon Mutesa, Gashegu Misbah, Eric Remera, Hans Ebbers, Esther Schalke, Patrick Tuyisenge, Reuben Sindayiheba, Clement Igiraneza, Jeanine Uwimana, Diane Mbabazi, Epimaque Kayonga, Michel Twagiramungu, Denyse Mugwaneza, Leandre Ishema, Yvan Butera, Clarisse Musanabaganwa, Edson Rwagasore, Friederike Twele, Sebastian Meller, Albert Tuyishime, Robert Rutayisire, Marilyn Milumbu Murindahabi, Lindsay A. Wilson, Noella Bigirimana, Holger A. Volk, Vedaste Ndahindwa, Benoit Kayijuka, Edward J. Mills, Claude Mambo Muvunyi, Sabin Nsanzimana |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Rwanda | 29 | 49% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 75% |
| Scientists | 7 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 134. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2024.
All research outputs
#325,857
of 26,277,952 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#130
of 7,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,156
of 501,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#9
of 494 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,277,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 501,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 494 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.