The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Intima-media thickness cut-off values depicting “halo sign” and potential confounder analysis for the best diagnosis of large vessel giant cell arteritis by ultrasonography
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, December 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.1055524 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marcin Milchert, Jacek Fliciński, Marek Brzosko |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 22% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 22% |
Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 44% |
Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
Computer Science | 1 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#18,291,775
of 23,495,502 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,879
of 6,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,370
of 441,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#265
of 453 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,495,502 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 453 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.