The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reliability assessment of ultrasound muscle echogenicity in patients with rheumatic diseases: Results of a multicenter international web-based study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.1090468 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Di Matteo, Erica Moscioni, Maria Giovanna Lommano, Edoardo Cipolletta, Gianluca Smerilli, Sonia Farah, Carla Airoldi, Sibel Zehra Aydin, Andrea Becciolini, Karina Bonfiglioli, Marina Carotti, Greta Carrara, Tomas Cazenave, Davide Corradini, Micaela Ana Cosatti, Juan Josè de Agustin, Giulia Maria Destro Castaniti, Marco Di Carlo, Eleonora Di Donato, Luca Di Geso, Ashley Elliott, Daniela Fodor, Francesca Francioso, Alessandra Gabba, Cristina Hernández-Díaz, Rudolf Horvath, Jana Hurnakova, Diogo Jesus, Josefina Marin, Maria Victoria Martire, Riccardo Mashadi Mirza, Marco Massarotti, Alice Andreea Musca, Jagdish Nair, Tadashi Okano, Ioannis Papalopoulos, Javier Rosa, Marcos Rosemffet, João Rovisco, Davide Rozza, Fausto Salaffi, Crescenzio Scioscia, Carlo Alberto Scirè, Maria-Magdalena Tamas, Shun Tanimura, Lucio Ventura-Rios, Catalina Villota-Eraso, Orlando Villota, Paraskevi V. Voulgari, Florentin Ananu Vreju, Gentiana Vukatana, Johana Zacariaz Hereter, Anna Zanetti, Walter Grassi, Emilio Filippucci |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 18% |
| Librarian | 1 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 27% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Engineering | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2023.
All research outputs
#15,771,014
of 24,213,557 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,131
of 6,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,822
of 439,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#169
of 399 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,213,557 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 399 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.