↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating performance of the 2019 EULAR/ACR, 2012 SLICC, and 1997 ACR criteria for classifying adult-onset and childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating performance of the 2019 EULAR/ACR, 2012 SLICC, and 1997 ACR criteria for classifying adult-onset and childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, December 2022
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2022.1093213
Pubmed ID
Authors

Butsabong Lerkvaleekul, Pantira Chobchai, Sasivimol Rattanasiri, Soamarat Vilaiyuk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Researcher 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Unknown 13 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#18,919,226
of 23,445,423 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#4,195
of 6,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,019
of 436,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#279
of 441 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,445,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 441 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.