↓ Skip to main content

Online, Face-to-Face, or Blended Learning? Faculty and Medical Students' Perceptions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Medicine, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Online, Face-to-Face, or Blended Learning? Faculty and Medical Students' Perceptions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Study
Published in
Frontiers in Medicine, February 2022
DOI 10.3389/fmed.2022.791352
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hani Atwa, Mohamed Hany Shehata, Ahmed Al-Ansari, Archana Kumar, Ahmed Jaradat, Jamil Ahmed, Abdelhalim Deifalla

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 220 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 21 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Student > Master 17 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 5%
Researcher 10 5%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 108 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 13%
Social Sciences 20 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Arts and Humanities 8 4%
Computer Science 7 3%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 106 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,117,241
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#805
of 6,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,980
of 517,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#68
of 621 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 621 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.