You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Novel Application of 18F-NaF PET/CT Imaging for Evaluation of Active Bone Remodeling in Diabetic Patients With Charcot Neuropathy: A Proof-of-Concept Report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.795925 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nguyen K. Tram, Ting-Heng Chou, Surina Patel, Laila N. Ettefagh, Michael R. Go, Said A. Atway, Mitchel R. Stacy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 33% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 1 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,582,947
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,541
of 5,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,849
of 439,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#157
of 650 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 650 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.